← All projects

Student research · Texas A&M University–San Antonio

Chemistry or
rotation size?

Auditing pair-level familiarity metrics in the NBA. I built MWDT (Minutes Weighted Dyadic Tenure) to measure how much time specific teammates spend on the floor together, then tested what it really captures.

Submitted to MIT Sloan SSAC 2027

Supervised by Dr. Tan Kim, Department of Management

5 players on the floor10 pairs, every minute

The question

Teams talk about chemistry, and lineup data make it easy to turn shared minutes into a chemistry number. Research suggests familiarity lives between specific people, not across a whole roster. So I measured it pair by pair, across all 30 NBA teams from 2022–23 to 2024–25, and asked what such a metric actually measures.

Key findings

r = .52

MWDT tracks team Net Rating closely: one standard deviation goes with about +2 points per 100 possessions.

r = .994

But every minute puts exactly 10 pairs on the floor, so MWDT mostly counts how few player pairs a team used: its rotation size. Once rotation size is controlled, MWDT adds nothing.

+1.2

Among teams with similar rotations, running more minutes through the 10 most-used pairs looked helpful (Net Rating per SD). This result is exploratory, not established.

Two scatter plots: MWDT falls almost perfectly with the number of player pairs used (r = 0.994), and Net Rating rises slightly with top-10 pair share after controlling for rotation size
(a) MWDT vs. player pairs used. (b) Net Rating vs. top-10 pair share, net of rotation size and controls. N = 90 team-seasons.

Why it matters

Any chemistry or continuity metric built from shared minutes should be checked against rotation size before it informs roster decisions. All data, code and results are open and reproducible on GitHub.

Luca presenting his research poster to the president of Texas A&M University–San Antonio

Spring 2026

Presenting my research to the president of Texas A&M University–San Antonio.